1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Fanstastic vs FOG: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fanstastic (Fanstastic) and FOG (Forex Optimum Group Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
Fanstastic and FOG are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Fanstastic holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FOG holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Fanstastic | FOG | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fanstastic vs FOG
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Fanstastic | FOG |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Fanstastic | Forex Optimum Group Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | 1 Floor, First St. Vincent Bank Ltd Building, James Street, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Forex, metal CFDs, indices, commodity CFDs, stock CFDs |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Fanstastic and FOG against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Fanstastic vs FOG
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fanstastic or FOG?
Both Fanstastic and FOG hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Fanstastic maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FOG maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fanstastic and FOG?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fanstastic records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with FOG at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Fanstastic and FOG differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Fanstastic lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FOG lists Forex, metal CFDs, indices, commodity CFDs, stock CFDs with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fanstastic or FOG?
Fanstastic carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FOG carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.