1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FOG vs Royal: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FOG (Forex Optimum Group Limited) and Royal (Royal) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
Royal outranks FOG by +6.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, FOG holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Royal holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FOG | Royal | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 7.0 | +6.0 | Royal |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 7.0 | +6.0 | Royal |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | Royal |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 8.0 | +7.0 | Royal |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 7.0 | +6.0 | Royal |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FOG vs Royal
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FOG | Royal |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Forex Optimum Group Limited | Royal |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 4 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1 Floor, First St. Vincent Bank Ltd Building, James Street, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines | Suite 1502,Level15, 60 Margaret St,SydneyNSW2000 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, metal CFDs, indices, commodity CFDs, stock CFDs | Forex, precious metals, crude oil, stock indices, futures, cryptocurrencies and stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Spanish, Indonesian, Polish, Chinese, English, Other languages |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FOG and Royal against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FOG vs Royal
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FOG or Royal?
Royal holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 0). Specifically, FOG maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Royal maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (CMA, SVG FSA, VFSC, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FOG and Royal?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FOG records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Royal at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do FOG and Royal differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FOG lists Forex, metal CFDs, indices, commodity CFDs, stock CFDs with execution software [MT4], while Royal lists Forex, precious metals, crude oil, stock indices, futures, cryptocurrencies and stocks with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FOG or Royal?
FOG carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Royal carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.