1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
RECRD vs TargetFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of RECRD (RECRD) and TargetFX (TargetFX Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
RECRD and TargetFX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, RECRD holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas TargetFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | RECRD | TargetFX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | RECRD |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: RECRD vs TargetFX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | RECRD | TargetFX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | RECRD | TargetFX Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | Ground Floor, La Place Creole Building, Rodney Village, Gros-Islet, Saint Lucia. 407,Business Village, Port Saeed, Dubai, UAE |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Currency pair CFDs, spot metals, cryptocurrencies, spot energies, indices and stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | RECRD | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare RECRD and TargetFX against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: RECRD vs TargetFX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: RECRD or TargetFX?
Both RECRD and TargetFX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, RECRD maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas TargetFX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between RECRD and TargetFX?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), RECRD records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with TargetFX at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do RECRD and TargetFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
RECRD lists general financial services with execution software [RECRD], while TargetFX lists Currency pair CFDs, spot metals, cryptocurrencies, spot energies, indices and stocks with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: RECRD or TargetFX?
RECRD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while TargetFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.