1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
PACMOON vs UGAM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of PACMOON (PACMOON) and UGAM (United Global Asset Management) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
PACMOON and UGAM are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.5 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, PACMOON holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas UGAM holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | PACMOON | UGAM | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: PACMOON vs UGAM
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | PACMOON | UGAM |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PACMOON | United Global Asset Management |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | - | T19, 1st Floor, Tana Russet Plaza, Kumul Highway, Port Villa, Efate, Vanuatu P.O. Box 1510 Suite 305, Griffith Corporate Centre, Beachmont Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | FX CFDs (CFD), precious metals, commodities, US blue-chip stocks and cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare PACMOON and UGAM against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: PACMOON vs UGAM
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: PACMOON or UGAM?
Both PACMOON and UGAM hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, PACMOON maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas UGAM maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between PACMOON and UGAM?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), PACMOON records an Overall Score of 1.5 (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with UGAM at 1.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do PACMOON and UGAM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
PACMOON lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while UGAM lists FX CFDs (CFD), precious metals, commodities, US blue-chip stocks and cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: PACMOON or UGAM?
PACMOON carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while UGAM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.