1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
OneRoyal vs Rock-West: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of OneRoyal (Royal Financial Trading Pty Ltd.) and Rock-West (MAIV LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
Rock-West outranks OneRoyal by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, OneRoyal holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Rock-West holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | OneRoyal | Rock-West | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Rock-West |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Rock-West |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Rock-West |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Rock-West |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Rock-West |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: OneRoyal vs Rock-West
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | OneRoyal | Rock-West |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Royal Financial Trading Pty Ltd. | MAIV LIMITED |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 152 Fragklinou Rousvelt, 3045 Limassol, Cyprus 4300 N University DR care suite D206, Sunrise FL 33351, U.S.A. Level 7, 1 York Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia. Suite 305, Griffith Corporate Centre, Beachmont, Kingstown, St. Vincent & the Grenadines | JUC Building, office NoF7A, Providence Zone 18, Mahe, Seychelles |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX main currency pairs, FX minor currency pairs, metals, indices, oil, cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETF | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare OneRoyal and Rock-West against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: OneRoyal vs Rock-West
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: OneRoyal or Rock-West?
OneRoyal holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, OneRoyal maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC, CYSEC, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Rock-West maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between OneRoyal and Rock-West?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), OneRoyal records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Rock-West at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do OneRoyal and Rock-West differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
OneRoyal lists FX main currency pairs, FX minor currency pairs, metals, indices, oil, cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETF with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Rock-West lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: OneRoyal or Rock-West?
OneRoyal carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Rock-West carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.