1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
OnEquity vs Ragnafi: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of OnEquity (OnEquity) and Ragnafi (Ragnafi) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
OnEquity outranks Ragnafi by +5.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, OnEquity holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Ragnafi holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | OnEquity | Ragnafi | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.7 | 1.0 | +5.7 | OnEquity |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | OnEquity |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | OnEquity |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.5 | 1.0 | +5.5 | OnEquity |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | OnEquity |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: OnEquity vs Ragnafi
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | OnEquity | Ragnafi |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | OnEquity | Ragnafi |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CT House, Office 6C, Providence, Mahe, Seychelles | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex currencies, commodities, global indices, stock CFDs, spot precious metals and cryptocurrency CFDs | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare OnEquity and Ragnafi against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: OnEquity vs Ragnafi
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: OnEquity or Ragnafi?
OnEquity holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 0). Specifically, OnEquity maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (SVG FSA, Financial Services Authority Seychelles, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Ragnafi maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between OnEquity and Ragnafi?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), OnEquity records an Overall Score of 6.7 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Ragnafi at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do OnEquity and Ragnafi differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
OnEquity lists Forex currencies, commodities, global indices, stock CFDs, spot precious metals and cryptocurrency CFDs with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Ragnafi lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: OnEquity or Ragnafi?
OnEquity carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Ragnafi carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.