1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Mercury Protocol vs RECRD: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Mercury Protocol (Mercury Protocol) and RECRD (RECRD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
Mercury Protocol and RECRD are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Mercury Protocol holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RECRD holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Mercury Protocol | RECRD | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Mercury Protocol |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Mercury Protocol vs RECRD
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Mercury Protocol | RECRD |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Mercury Protocol | RECRD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Transfers | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | RECRD |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Mercury Protocol and RECRD against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Mercury Protocol vs RECRD
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Mercury Protocol or RECRD?
Both Mercury Protocol and RECRD hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Mercury Protocol maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RECRD maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Mercury Protocol and RECRD?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Mercury Protocol records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with RECRD at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Mercury Protocol and RECRD differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Mercury Protocol lists Transfers with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while RECRD lists general financial services with execution software [RECRD]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Mercury Protocol or RECRD?
Mercury Protocol carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RECRD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.