1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IC Trading vs MAKASKY: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IC Trading (IC Trading) and MAKASKY (MAKASKY Limited.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
IC Trading and MAKASKY are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, IC Trading holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MAKASKY holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IC Trading | MAKASKY | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | IC Trading |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | IC Trading |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | IC Trading |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IC Trading vs MAKASKY
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IC Trading | MAKASKY |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | IC Trading | MAKASKY Limited. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 803, 8th Floor, Hennessy Tower, Pope Hennessy Street, 11328, Port Louis, Mauritius | MY |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, commodities, stocks, bonds and cryptocurrencies CFDs | FX ：40+ currency pairs (main, minor, exotic), CFDs ： indices, commodities, stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Malay, Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IC Trading and MAKASKY against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IC Trading vs MAKASKY
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IC Trading or MAKASKY?
Both IC Trading and MAKASKY hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, IC Trading maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MAKASKY maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Labuan FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IC Trading and MAKASKY?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IC Trading records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MAKASKY at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do IC Trading and MAKASKY differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IC Trading lists FX, indices, commodities, stocks, bonds and cryptocurrencies CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5], while MAKASKY lists FX ：40+ currency pairs (main, minor, exotic), CFDs ： indices, commodities, stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IC Trading or MAKASKY?
IC Trading carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MAKASKY carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.