1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GRACEX vs Gull Network: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GRACEX (Gracex International Ltd) and Gull Network (Gull Network) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
GRACEX and Gull Network are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, GRACEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Gull Network holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GRACEX | Gull Network | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GRACEX vs Gull Network
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GRACEX | Gull Network |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Gracex International Ltd | Gull Network |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Hamchako Mutsamudu,The Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros. / Republica Moldova, Municipiul Chisinau , Centru ,Bd Stefan cel Mare si Sfant 171/1 / Ground Floor The Sotheby Building , Rodney Village , Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet,Saint Lucia | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs on currency pairs, oil, gold, silver, indices, stocks, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies | decentralised exchange (DEX), liquidity pools, yield farming, launchpad, cross-chain asset bridging |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GRACEX and Gull Network against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GRACEX vs Gull Network
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GRACEX or Gull Network?
Both GRACEX and Gull Network hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, GRACEX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Gull Network maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GRACEX and Gull Network?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GRACEX records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Gull Network at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do GRACEX and Gull Network differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GRACEX lists CFDs on currency pairs, oil, gold, silver, indices, stocks, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT5], while Gull Network lists decentralised exchange (DEX), liquidity pools, yield farming, launchpad, cross-chain asset bridging with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GRACEX or Gull Network?
GRACEX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Gull Network carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.