1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GFM vs IC Trading: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GFM (GFM) and IC Trading (IC Trading) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
IC Trading outranks GFM by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, GFM holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas IC Trading holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GFM | IC Trading | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | IC Trading |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | IC Trading |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | IC Trading |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | IC Trading |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | IC Trading |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GFM vs IC Trading
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GFM | IC Trading |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | GFM | IC Trading |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | MU | Suite 803, 8th Floor, Hennessy Tower, Pope Hennessy Street, 11328, Port Louis, Mauritius |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | FX, indices, commodities, stocks, bonds and cryptocurrencies CFDs |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GFM and IC Trading against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GFM vs IC Trading
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GFM or IC Trading?
IC Trading holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, GFM maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas IC Trading maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GFM and IC Trading?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GFM records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with IC Trading at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do GFM and IC Trading differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GFM lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while IC Trading lists FX, indices, commodities, stocks, bonds and cryptocurrencies CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GFM or IC Trading?
GFM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while IC Trading carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.