Skip to content
Sovereign Tax Atlas
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXON vs STARTRADER: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXON (FXON Ltd.) and STARTRADER (STARTRADER) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxon-vs-startrader

STARTRADER outranks FXON by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, FXON holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas STARTRADER holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXONSTARTRADERScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite4.07.0+3.0STARTRADER
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight4.07.0+3.0STARTRADER
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight2.05.0+3.0STARTRADER
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight4.05.0+1.0STARTRADER
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight4.07.0+3.0STARTRADER

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXON vs STARTRADER

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXON vs STARTRADER
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXON and STARTRADER.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXONSTARTRADER
Primary Legal NameFXON Ltd.STARTRADER
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressHOUSE OF FRANCIS, ROOM 301(A), ILE DU PORT, MAHE, SEYCHELLESBlock B, Room 2, No.2, Global Village, Jivan’s Complex, Mont Fleuri, Mahe, Seychelles.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX and stocks, indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and related services assets CFDsFX, commodities, indices, stocks, precious metals and related services
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, JapaneseOther regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, English, Japanese, French, German
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXON and STARTRADER against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXON vs STARTRADER

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXON or STARTRADER?

Both FXON and STARTRADER hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FXON maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas STARTRADER maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, ASIC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXON and STARTRADER?

In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXON records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with STARTRADER at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).

How do FXON and STARTRADER differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXON lists FX and stocks, indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and related services assets CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5], while STARTRADER lists FX, commodities, indices, stocks, precious metals and related services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXON or STARTRADER?

FXON carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while STARTRADER carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXON vs STARTRADER (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Sovereign Tax Atlas