1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FXON vs Prodigy: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXON (FXON Ltd.) and Prodigy (Prodigy Trading LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
FXON outranks Prodigy by +1.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 2.8)
On supervisory breadth, FXON holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Prodigy holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FXON | Prodigy | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 2.8 | +1.2 | FXON |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 2.8 | +1.2 | FXON |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 2.8 | +1.2 | FXON |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 2.8 | +1.2 | FXON |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXON vs Prodigy
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FXON | Prodigy |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FXON Ltd. | Prodigy Trading LTD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | HOUSE OF FRANCIS, ROOM 301(A), ILE DU PORT, MAHE, SEYCHELLES | Office number 208 White Swan building Near World Trade Center Metro Shaikh Zayed Road, Dubai , UAE Level 3 Ebene House, Hotel Avenue, 33 Cybercity, 1721-04, Port Louis, 72201, Mauritius. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX and stocks, indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and related services assets CFDs | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Japanese | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FXON and Prodigy against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FXON vs Prodigy
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXON or Prodigy?
Both FXON and Prodigy hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FXON maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Prodigy maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXON and Prodigy?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXON records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Prodigy at 2.8 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.8, Brand: 2.8, Market Influence: 2.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do FXON and Prodigy differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FXON lists FX and stocks, indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and related services assets CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Prodigy lists general financial services with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXON or Prodigy?
FXON carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Prodigy carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.