1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FISG vs SBM bank: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FISG (Interstellar Financial Group Limited) and SBM bank (SBMbank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
SBM bank outranks FISG by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, FISG holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SBM bank holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FISG | SBM bank | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | SBM bank |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | SBM bank |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | SBM bank |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | SBM bank |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FISG vs SBM bank
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FISG | SBM bank |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Interstellar Financial Group Limited | SBMbank |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Bank of Mauritius (BoM): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Euro House, Richmond Hill Road, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines | SBM Tower, 1, Queen Elizabeth II Avenue, Port Louis, Mauritius |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs on foreign exchange, stocks, indices and commodities | Finance and Insurance |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FISG and SBM bank against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FISG vs SBM bank
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FISG or SBM bank?
FISG holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, FISG maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, CYSEC, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SBM bank maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Bank of Mauritius (BoM)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FISG and SBM bank?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FISG records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SBM bank at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do FISG and SBM bank differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FISG lists CFDs on foreign exchange, stocks, indices and commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while SBM bank lists Finance and Insurance with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FISG or SBM bank?
FISG carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SBM bank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.