1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FidelisCM vs FT Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FidelisCM (FidelisCM) and FT Markets (FT Markets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
FT Markets outranks FidelisCM by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, FidelisCM holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FT Markets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FidelisCM | FT Markets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | FT Markets |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | FT Markets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | FT Markets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | FT Markets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FidelisCM vs FT Markets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FidelisCM | FT Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FidelisCM | FT Markets |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Financial Services Authority Seychelles: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 52 Cybercity, 8th Floor, Ebene Tower,, Ebene | 50 Omonoias, Limassol, Cypros |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Arabic, Chinese, English, Russian | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FidelisCM and FT Markets against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FidelisCM vs FT Markets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FidelisCM or FT Markets?
Both FidelisCM and FT Markets hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FidelisCM maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SVG FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FT Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FidelisCM and FT Markets?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FidelisCM records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with FT Markets at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do FidelisCM and FT Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FidelisCM lists general financial services with execution software [MT4], while FT Markets lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FidelisCM or FT Markets?
FidelisCM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FT Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.