1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Deriv vs SM-INVEST: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Deriv (Deriv (FX) Ltd) and SM-INVEST (Scope Markets Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
SM-INVEST outranks Deriv by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.3 vs 5.3)
On supervisory breadth, Deriv holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SM-INVEST holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Deriv | SM-INVEST | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.3 | 6.3 | +1.0 | SM-INVEST |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | SM-INVEST |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 6.7 | +0.7 | SM-INVEST |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | SM-INVEST |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Deriv vs SM-INVEST
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Deriv | SM-INVEST |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Deriv (FX) Ltd | Scope Markets Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 3, W Business Centre, Triq Dun Karm, Birkirkara, BKR 9033 Office 1902, Jumeirah Business Center 1, JLT Cluster G Suite 1, Ground Floor, Block D Apex Forbury Road Reading RG1 1AX | 6160, Park Avenue, Buttonwood Bay, Lower Flat Office Space Front, Belize City |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Foreign exchange, composite index, stock index, commodities | FX (can trading more than 30 currency pairs), indices, energy, metals, stocks and cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Other languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Portuguese, Bengali, Vietnamese, Polish, English, Korean | Spanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Deriv and SM-INVEST against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Deriv vs SM-INVEST
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Deriv or SM-INVEST?
Deriv holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, Deriv maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC, BVIFSC, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, Labuan FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SM-INVEST maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Deriv and SM-INVEST?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Deriv records an Overall Score of 5.3 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SM-INVEST at 6.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.7, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Deriv and SM-INVEST differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Deriv lists Foreign exchange, composite index, stock index, commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SM-INVEST lists FX (can trading more than 30 currency pairs), indices, energy, metals, stocks and cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Deriv or SM-INVEST?
Deriv carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SM-INVEST carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.