1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Deriv vs FBS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Deriv (Deriv (FX) Ltd) and FBS (FBS) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
FBS outranks Deriv by +0.9 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.2 vs 5.3)
On supervisory breadth, Deriv holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FBS holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Deriv | FBS | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.3 | 6.2 | +0.9 | FBS |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.5 | +1.5 | FBS |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 6.2 | +0.2 | FBS |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 5.9 | +1.9 | FBS |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Deriv vs FBS
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Deriv | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Deriv (FX) Ltd | FBS |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 3, W Business Centre, Triq Dun Karm, Birkirkara, BKR 9033 Office 1902, Jumeirah Business Center 1, JLT Cluster G Suite 1, Ground Floor, Block D Apex Forbury Road Reading RG1 1AX | BZ |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Foreign exchange, composite index, stock index, commodities | major currency pairs, minor currency pairs, exotic currency pairs, metals, stocks, energy, indices |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Other languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Portuguese, Bengali, Vietnamese, Polish, English, Korean | Other regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Turkish, English, German |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Deriv and FBS against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Deriv vs FBS
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Deriv or FBS?
Deriv holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 2). Specifically, Deriv maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC, BVIFSC, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, Labuan FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FBS maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, ASIC, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Deriv and FBS?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Deriv records an Overall Score of 5.3 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with FBS at 6.2 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.2, Market Influence: 5.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Deriv and FBS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Deriv lists Foreign exchange, composite index, stock index, commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FBS lists major currency pairs, minor currency pairs, exotic currency pairs, metals, stocks, energy, indices with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Deriv or FBS?
Deriv carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FBS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.