1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Deek vs fan.tech: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Deek (Deek) and fan.tech (fan.tech) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
Deek outranks fan.tech by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Deek holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas fan.tech holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Deek | fan.tech | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | Deek |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | Deek |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Deek |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | Deek |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | Deek |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Deek vs fan.tech
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Deek | fan.tech |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Deek | fan.tech |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | - | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Deek and fan.tech against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Deek vs fan.tech
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Deek or fan.tech?
Both Deek and fan.tech hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Deek maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas fan.tech maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Deek and fan.tech?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Deek records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with fan.tech at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Deek and fan.tech differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Deek lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while fan.tech lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Deek or fan.tech?
Deek carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while fan.tech carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.