1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CXC vs Deriv: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CXC (CXCMarkets Group) and Deriv (Deriv (FX) Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
Deriv outranks CXC by +3.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.3 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, CXC holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Deriv holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CXC | Deriv | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.5 | 5.3 | +3.8 | Deriv |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.5 | 5.0 | +3.5 | Deriv |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Deriv |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 6.0 | +4.5 | Deriv |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 4.0 | +2.5 | Deriv |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CXC vs Deriv
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CXC | Deriv |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CXCMarkets Group | Deriv (FX) Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 310, Griffith Corporate Center, Beachmont, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines. | Level 3, W Business Centre, Triq Dun Karm, Birkirkara, BKR 9033 Office 1902, Jumeirah Business Center 1, JLT Cluster G Suite 1, Ground Floor, Block D Apex Forbury Road Reading RG1 1AX |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | cryptocurrencies, stocks, CFDs, oil products, energy, precious metals, commodities, FX | Foreign exchange, composite index, stock index, commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean | Other languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Portuguese, Bengali, Vietnamese, Polish, English, Korean |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CXC and Deriv against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CXC vs Deriv
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CXC or Deriv?
Deriv holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 0). Specifically, CXC maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Deriv maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (VFSC, BVIFSC, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, Labuan FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CXC and Deriv?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CXC records an Overall Score of 1.5 (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Deriv at 5.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do CXC and Deriv differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CXC lists cryptocurrencies, stocks, CFDs, oil products, energy, precious metals, commodities, FX with execution software [MT4], while Deriv lists Foreign exchange, composite index, stock index, commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CXC or Deriv?
CXC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Deriv carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.