Skip to content
Sovereign Tax Atlas
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CTrading vs Paintswap: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CTrading (CTrading) and Paintswap (Paintswap) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: ctrading-vs-paintswap

Paintswap outranks CTrading by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, CTrading holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Paintswap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCTradingPaintswapScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.05.0+3.0Paintswap
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.05.0+3.0Paintswap
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.03.0+2.0Paintswap
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.05.0+3.0Paintswap
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.05.0+3.0Paintswap

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CTrading vs Paintswap

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CTrading vs Paintswap
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CTrading and Paintswap.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCTradingPaintswap
Primary Legal NameCTradingPaintswap
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressInternationalInternational
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesdecentralised exchange (DEX), NFT marketplace, NFT launchpad (Launchpad), yield mining, GameFi
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CTrading and Paintswap against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CTrading vs Paintswap

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CTrading or Paintswap?

Both CTrading and Paintswap hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CTrading maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Paintswap maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CTrading and Paintswap?

In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CTrading records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Paintswap at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do CTrading and Paintswap differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CTrading lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Paintswap lists decentralised exchange (DEX), NFT marketplace, NFT launchpad (Launchpad), yield mining, GameFi with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CTrading or Paintswap?

CTrading carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Paintswap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CTrading vs Paintswap (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Sovereign Tax Atlas