1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CRIPTIMPACT vs THAT App: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CRIPTIMPACT (CRIPTIMPACT Inc.) and THAT App (THAT App) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
THAT App outranks CRIPTIMPACT by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.3 vs 1.2)
On supervisory breadth, CRIPTIMPACT holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas THAT App holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CRIPTIMPACT | THAT App | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.2 | 1.3 | +0.1 | THAT App |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.2 | 1.5 | +0.3 | THAT App |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.2 | 1.6 | +0.4 | THAT App |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.2 | 1.6 | +0.4 | THAT App |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CRIPTIMPACT vs THAT App
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CRIPTIMPACT | THAT App |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CRIPTIMPACT Inc. | THAT App |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 5915 Sky Pond, Loveland, Colorado, United States C/o Suite 305, Griffith Corporate Centre, Beachmont, Box 1510 Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines | - |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, fixed income, stocks investment, cryptocurrencies | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CRIPTIMPACT and THAT App against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CRIPTIMPACT vs THAT App
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CRIPTIMPACT or THAT App?
Both CRIPTIMPACT and THAT App hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CRIPTIMPACT maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas THAT App maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CRIPTIMPACT and THAT App?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CRIPTIMPACT records an Overall Score of 1.2 (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.2, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with THAT App at 1.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CRIPTIMPACT and THAT App differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CRIPTIMPACT lists FX, fixed income, stocks investment, cryptocurrencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while THAT App lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CRIPTIMPACT or THAT App?
CRIPTIMPACT carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while THAT App carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.