1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
bytom vs Zed Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of bytom (bytomDAO) and Zed Capital (Zed Capital International Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
bytom and Zed Capital are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, bytom holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Zed Capital holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | bytom | Zed Capital | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: bytom vs Zed Capital
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | bytom | Zed Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | bytomDAO | Zed Capital International Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | Level 7, Iconebene, Lot B441, Rue de l'Institut, Ebene, Mauritius 1606, Concord Tower, Near Palm Jumeirah Tram Station, Media City, Dubai - UAE. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare bytom and Zed Capital against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: bytom vs Zed Capital
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: bytom or Zed Capital?
Both bytom and Zed Capital hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, bytom maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Zed Capital maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between bytom and Zed Capital?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), bytom records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Zed Capital at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do bytom and Zed Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
bytom lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Zed Capital lists general financial services with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: bytom or Zed Capital?
bytom carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Zed Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.