1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Blafx vs OnFin: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Blafx (BETHLE ASTER GLOBAL INVESTMENT LIMITED) and OnFin (OnFin Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
Blafx and OnFin are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Blafx holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas OnFin holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Blafx | OnFin | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 9.0 | 1.0 | +8.0 | Blafx |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | OnFin |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 9.0 | 1.0 | +8.0 | Blafx |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Blafx vs OnFin
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Blafx | OnFin |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | BETHLE ASTER GLOBAL INVESTMENT LIMITED | OnFin Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Office 5, 8/F, Mega Cube, 8 Wang Kwong Road, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong | Moheli Corporate Services LTD P.B. 1257 Bonovo Road, Fomboni, Comoros, KM |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | Indonesian, Malay, English, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Blafx and OnFin against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Blafx vs OnFin
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Blafx or OnFin?
OnFin holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Blafx maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas OnFin maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (MISA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Blafx and OnFin?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Blafx records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 9.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 9.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with OnFin at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Blafx and OnFin differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Blafx lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while OnFin lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Blafx or OnFin?
Blafx carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while OnFin carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.