1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AETOS vs Red Arrow: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AETOS (AETOS Markets (V) Ltd.) and Red Arrow (Redarrow Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
AETOS outranks Red Arrow by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, AETOS holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Red Arrow holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AETOS | Red Arrow | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | AETOS |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | AETOS |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | AETOS |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | AETOS |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | AETOS |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AETOS vs Red Arrow
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AETOS | Red Arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | AETOS Markets (V) Ltd. | Redarrow Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | PO Box 1276, Govant Building, 278 Kumul Highway, Port Vila, Vanuatu Level15,122Arthur Street,North Sydney,NSW2060,Australia 1st Floor, 415 High Street, Stratford, London, E15 4QZ 4th Floor, Willow House, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman, KY1-9010 Cayman Islands. | P.B. 1257, Bonovo Road, Fomboni, Mohéli Island, Comoros |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stock indices, Forex, Stocks, Metals, Energies | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Simplified Chinese, Vietnamese, Malao (source label, language unclear), Thai | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AETOS and Red Arrow against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AETOS vs Red Arrow
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AETOS or Red Arrow?
AETOS holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 0). Specifically, AETOS maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (CIMA, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, VFSC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Red Arrow maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AETOS and Red Arrow?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AETOS records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Red Arrow at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do AETOS and Red Arrow differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AETOS lists Stock indices, Forex, Stocks, Metals, Energies with execution software [MT4], while Red Arrow lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AETOS or Red Arrow?
AETOS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Red Arrow carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.