1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
7option vs Cleopatra Exchange: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 7option (SOVANA HOLDING PC) and Cleopatra Exchange (Cleopatra Exchange) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed in offshore financial centres
7option and Cleopatra Exchange are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.4 vs 1.4)
On supervisory breadth, 7option holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Cleopatra Exchange holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 7option | Cleopatra Exchange | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 7option vs Cleopatra Exchange
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 7option | Cleopatra Exchange |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | SOVANA HOLDING PC | Cleopatra Exchange |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | -- | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 7option and Cleopatra Exchange against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 7option vs Cleopatra Exchange
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 7option or Cleopatra Exchange?
Both 7option and Cleopatra Exchange hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 7option maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Cleopatra Exchange maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 7option and Cleopatra Exchange?
In Sovereign Tax Atlas's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 7option records an Overall Score of 1.4 (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Cleopatra Exchange at 1.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do 7option and Cleopatra Exchange differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
7option lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Cleopatra Exchange lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 7option or Cleopatra Exchange?
7option carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Cleopatra Exchange carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.