Institution record
Inpay
Inpay A/S
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (institutions licensed in offshore financial centres) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Inpay against peer institutions in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inpay (this record) | DFSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| AETOS | FSAFSCVFSC+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Deriv | BVIFSCVFSCLabuan+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Mohicans Markets | VFSCMISAFSC+2 | 4 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Doo Prime | FSAFSCVFSC+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| GLOBAL | VFSCFSCFSA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Inpay: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Inpay's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Inpay (legal entity reference: Inpay A/S) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: DFSA (Danish Financial Supervisory Authority) — licence 32317731, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official DFSA public register.
Which of Inpay's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Inpay is registered at Kalvebod Brygge 45, 1560 Copenhagen V, Denmark and tracked under our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (DFSA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Inpay's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Inpay carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Inpay's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Inpay, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to DFSA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Sovereign Tax Atlas relevant to Inpay's supervisory scope.
Sovereign Tax & Treaty Architecture
OECD Pillar Two 15% Global Minimum Tax (QDMTT, IIR & UTPR), CARF Digital-Asset Reporting, and Cross-Border Financial Withholding Tax Architecture (2026)
An authoritative 2026 sovereign tax reference analyzing OECD/G20 GloBE 15% minimum effective tax rate (ETR) mechanics, QDMTT/IIR/UTPR charging priority for multinational banks and brokers, Investment Entity exclusions, IRC Section 871(m) dividend equivalents, and OECD CARF / EU DAC8 automatic exchange.
Cross-Border Tax Treaties
Luxembourg RAIF & SCSp vs Ireland ICAV vs Singapore VCC: Institutional Fund Domicile Tax Treaty Access & Dividend Withholding Matrix
Institutional fund domicile selection refers to structuring cross-border vehicles to cut U.S. and EU dividend withholding taxes from 30% to 0%–15% under bilateral tax treaties.
OECD Pillar Two & Global Minimum Tax
OECD Pillar Two 15% Global Minimum Tax: GloBE Rules, QDMTT, IIR & UTPR Institutional Reference (2026)
The OECD Pillar Two Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) framework enforces a 15% minimum effective tax rate across 145+ jurisdictions on multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues of at least EUR 750 million (Source: OECD Inclusive Framework, 2026-09-18).
OECD Pillar Two & Global Minimum Tax
OECD Pillar Two 15% Global Minimum Tax (GloBE, QDMTT, IIR & UTPR): Statutory vs. Bilateral Treaty Withholding Tax Rate Matrix (2026) (15.0% Minimum Effective Tax Rate Benchmark)
OECD Pillar Two 15% Global Minimum Tax (GloBE, QDMTT, IIR & UTPR) (OECD-GLOBE-QDMTT) stands at 15.0% (Minimum Effective Tax Rate) (Source: OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, 2026-10-20), governing dividend, interest, and roya