Institution record
Crypto
Crypto Brokers OÜ
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (institutions licensed in offshore financial centres) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Crypto against peer institutions in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto (this record) | FIUFIU | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| AETOS | FSAFSCVFSC+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Deriv | BVIFSCVFSCLabuan+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Mohicans Markets | VFSCMISAFSC+2 | 4 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Doo Prime | FSAFSCVFSC+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| GLOBAL | VFSCFSCFSA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Crypto: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Crypto's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Crypto (legal entity reference: Crypto Brokers OÜ) holds 2 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 2 are marked regulated or registered: FIU (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit) — licence FVT000346, status: regulated, Tier-2; FIU (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit) — licence FRK000284, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FIU public register.
Which of Crypto's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Crypto is registered at Laeva 2, Tallinn, 10111, Estonia and tracked under our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 2 recorded licences (FIU) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Crypto's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Crypto carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Crypto's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Crypto (listed execution software: Telegram Messenger, Telegram), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (telexai.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FIU.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Sovereign Tax Atlas relevant to Crypto's supervisory scope.
FATCA, CRS & Cross-Border Information Exchange
OECD CRS 2.0, Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) & FATCA Model 1 IGA: Statutory vs. Bilateral Treaty Withholding Tax Rate Matrix (2026) (30.0% Non-Compliant FATCA Chapter 4 WHT Benchmark)
OECD CRS 2.0, Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) & FATCA Model 1 IGA (CRS2-CARF-FATCA) stands at 30.0% (Non-Compliant FATCA Chapter 4 WHT) (Source: OECD / IRS IRC Sec. 1471, 2026-10-20), governing dividend, interest
OECD Pillar Two & Global Minimum Tax
OECD CRS 2.0, Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) & FATCA Model 1 IGA: Economic Substance, Minimum AUM & Local Staffing Qualification Rules (30.0% Non-Compliant FATCA Chapter 4 WHT Benchmark)
OECD CRS 2.0, Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) & FATCA Model 1 IGA (CRS2-CARF-FATCA) stands at 30.0% (Non-Compliant FATCA Chapter 4 WHT) (Source: OECD / IRS IRC Sec. 1471, 2026-10-20), governing designated investm
Institutional Fund Domiciles & Family Office Regimes
OECD CRS 2.0, Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) & FATCA Model 1 IGA: QDMTT, IIR & UTPR Effective Tax Rate (ETR) & Top-Up Calculation (30.0% Non-Compliant FATCA Chapter 4 WHT Benchmark)
OECD CRS 2.0, Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) & FATCA Model 1 IGA (CRS2-CARF-FATCA) stands at 30.0% (Non-Compliant FATCA Chapter 4 WHT) (Source: OECD / IRS IRC Sec. 1471, 2026-10-20), governing Substance-Based In
Cross-Border Tax Treaties
OECD CRS 2.0, Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) & FATCA Model 1 IGA: Limitation on Benefits (LOB), Principal Purpose Test & ATAD 2 Anti-Hybrid Rules (30.0% Non-Compliant FATCA Chapter 4 WHT Benchmark)
OECD CRS 2.0, Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) & FATCA Model 1 IGA (CRS2-CARF-FATCA) stands at 30.0% (Non-Compliant FATCA Chapter 4 WHT) (Source: OECD / IRS IRC Sec. 1471, 2026-10-20), governing active trade or bu