Institution record
CoinFlip
- Source score
- 5.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (institutions licensed in offshore financial centres) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | 1975146 | Regulated | CoinFlip | 2021-08-06 | |
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) | 31000291840717 | Regulated | GPD Holdings LLC | 2025-01-31 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing CoinFlip against peer institutions in our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoinFlip (this record) | SECFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Decode Global | SVG FSAVFSCASIC+1 | 2 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 |
| ONEUEX | CROSS-BORDERNFAADB / UNGM-APAC+4 | 0 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | 9.2 | 0 |
| Coinbase | BMACBICBI+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 8.5 | 1 |
| OKX | Financial Services Authority SeychellesSECFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 7.2 | 1 |
| XT.COM | DMCCFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) | 0 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.3 | 0 |
CoinFlip: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is CoinFlip's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, CoinFlip (legal entity reference: CoinFlip) holds 2 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 2 are marked regulated or registered: SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) — licence 1975146, status: regulated; Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) — licence 31000291840717, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SEC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) public register.
Which of CoinFlip's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
CoinFlip is tracked under our institutions licensed in offshore financial centres coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (multi-asset financial services) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 2 recorded licences (SEC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is CoinFlip's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
CoinFlip carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to CoinFlip's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with CoinFlip, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (coinflip.tech) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SEC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Sovereign Tax Atlas relevant to CoinFlip's supervisory scope.
Tax & Treaties
US IRC Section 871(m) Dividend Equivalent Withholding on Equity Derivatives & Qualified Derivatives Dealer (QDD) Rules (25 Oct 2026)
Cross-border withholding tax analysis filed 25 October 2026 covering IRS Section 871(m) delta-threshold tests, substantial equivalence calculations for complex options, and QI Agreement QDD net delta exposure.
Sovereign Tax & Treaty Architecture
OECD Pillar Two 15% Global Minimum Tax (QDMTT, IIR & UTPR), CARF Digital-Asset Reporting, and Cross-Border Financial Withholding Tax Architecture (2026)
An authoritative 2026 sovereign tax reference analyzing OECD/G20 GloBE 15% minimum effective tax rate (ETR) mechanics, QDMTT/IIR/UTPR charging priority for multinational banks and brokers, Investment Entity exclusions, IRC Section 871(m) dividend equivalents, and OECD CARF / EU DAC8 automatic exchange.
Institutional Fund Domiciles & Family Office Regimes
Institutional Fund Domiciles & Treaty Withholding Tax Matrix: Ireland ICAV, Luxembourg RAIF & Singapore 13O/13U (2026)
Institutional fund domicile selection between an Irish ICAV, a Luxembourg RAIF, and a Singapore Section 13O/13U vehicle determines whether U.S.-source equity dividends suffer the 30.0% statutory IRS withholding rate or a reduced 15.0% bilateral treaty rate (Source: IRS Publication 515, 2026-01-15).
FATCA, CRS & Cross-Border Information Exchange
Singapore MAS Section 13O (S$20M) & Section 13U (S$50M) Family Office Tax Exemption: Statutory vs. Bilateral Treaty Withholding Tax Rate Matrix (2026) (0.0% Exempt Specified Income Tax Benchmark)
Singapore MAS Section 13O (S$20M) & Section 13U (S$50M) Family Office Tax Exemption (SG-13O-13U-VCC) stands at 0.0% (Exempt Specified Income Tax) (Source: Monetary Authority of Singapore / IRAS, 2026-10-20), governing di